The fact that somebody scares the uninformed public shouldn't be the determining factor for whether it's appropriate. Especially if it's true: "a hacker can bri

The fact that somebody scares the uninformed public shouldn't be the determining factor for whether it's appropriate. Especially if it's true: "a hacker can bring down the plane" is an important claim to investigate. Even if you disagree with how he said it (and I certainly do), it shouldn't be forbidden just because it's sensational. The appropriate sanction is the professional scorn that he's already beginning to receive.