i am always amazed at how 3d printer articles brought to the forefront of this aggregator rarely, if ever, talk about the peachy printer in considering lowerin

i am always amazed at how 3d printer articles brought to the forefront of this aggregator rarely, if ever, talk about the peachy printer in considering lowering costs i suppose the question is who is assessing these costs: an individual, or a company form1 is interesting but at 3.3k that is quite expensive for an individual there is an effort for a 100$ stereolithographic printer called the peachy printer comparing specs: pP(i) form1(ii) resolution .2mm 20-200microns(.02-.2mm) build vol ?inf?* 125×125×165 software open closed price printer 100$** 3.3k$ price resin 60$ 150$ * peachy's design is formless, seemingly only limited by the tank volume and struts ** 100$ self assembly, 400$ fully built when the peachy is finalised and in the hands of users i think this build volume aspect will be a source of very interesting experimentation and debate peachy was impressive when it started its effort and has steadily improved but the really impressive element of the campaign for me is the transparency of development(iii), and the ethics of its staff(iv) also the software is opensource : https://github.com/PeachyPrinter https://github.com/PeachyPrinter . (i) http://www.peachyprinter.com/#!printer-specs/c1gk6 http://www.peachyprinter.com/#!printer-specs/c1gk6 (ii) http://formlabs.com/products/form-1-plus/ http://formlabs.com/products/form-1-plus/ (iii) https://www.youtube.com/user/PeachyPrinter https://www.youtube.com/user/PeachyPrinter (iv) http://www.peachyprinter.com/#!ethics/c2208 http://www.peachyprinter.com/#!ethics/c2208