This isn't like a full blown counter-argument, but a pattern I like to look for whenever there's debate on some kind of public policy change is if the 'anti' si

This isn't like a full blown counter-argument, but a pattern I like to look for whenever there's debate on some kind of public policy change is if the 'anti' side is predominately an argument for the status quo of car culture. To me this is the real climate change denial-ism. Not the abstract argument over whether its real or not, but the steady stream of personal and political decisions people make to prioritize car culture over X.