6 ms·
- there are people than those here in the western/first world - insects could/should substitute animal meat to save ressources and the decrease negative effect
by killerpopiller 11y ago
- there are people than those here in the western/first world
- insects could/should substitute animal meat to save ressources and the decrease negative effects of our livestyle (soil erosion, to many nutritions in water bodies..
- realusername 11y ago- This new trend is mainly targeted to developed countries currently. - If we divide the consumption of meat by at least five, we suddenly have much less problems. It's just a solution to the wrong problem. The problem is how people consume food, we are just not supposed to eat meat in such ridiculous quantities. Replacing meat with cricket meat is not going to solve that.
- CuriouslyC 11y agoI probably spend $400/month just on meat; I love it. You people who are trying to get people not to eat meat should stop trying to guilt people into forgoing things they enjoy and focus on reducing poverty or eradicating slavery. Those are much more worthy causes.
- realusername 11y agoI'm an not advocating on forcing people to switch to a vegetarian diet, I'm not a vegetarian myself. I just present the facts. People would be healthier by eating less meat than what they do currently, they don't need to remove it from their diet. It's great that you love it, most people love meat, I also love meat, that's why we are eating so much of it. I agree that there is a lot of loud vegetarian extremists out there but I'm not one of them, I would just like people to eat more balanced meals instead of the fast-food nonsense we have today.