5 ms·
StupidFilter - Detect stupid text
- emmett 17y agoTry submitting YouTube comments to the demo. This is shockingly accurate.
- hassy 17y agoAnyone up for StupidGolf? :-) My entry: "haha... lol" (11 chars)
- erikwiffin 17y agoI win. "!" (1 char) is likely to be stupid.
- onewland 17y ago"o hai, sup?" also 11
- coderdude 17y agoI can't get the thing to detect any stupidity whatsoever. I tried: -dude that was pretty funny lol -dude thats a funny one! lol -ur a ghey lord! All passed as not being likely to be stupid.
- buro9 17y agolmao!!!
- RyanMcGreal 17y ago>lmao!!! Text is likely to be stupid.
- aarongough 17y agoFrom the FAQ: Do you really expect to be able to detect and filter anything that's conceivably stupid? No, of course not. You'd need real AI for that, and beyond a certain point it's simply subjective; after all, a sufficiently advanced AI would probably filter out the whole of human discourse, which isn't the idea. I have to admit that I laughed pretty hard when I read that...
- silent_tone 17y agoThis is sort of like a Youtube Snob for the rest of the internet. http://www.chrisfinke.com/addons/youtube-comment-snob/ http://www.chrisfinke.com/addons/youtube-comment-snob/
- onewland 17y agoI think this is barfing on a lack of punctuation. "this is the most shittest game online ever full of little nooby kids" (taken from a youtube comment) is "not likely stupid". Add a period at the end, though, and it works. Maybe the parsing system isn't designed to handle incomplete sentences or sentence fragments? That could be difficult but key; many of the bottom of the barrel posts on the internet have no punctuation at all. Update: Starting to really take an interest in this. While there are false negatives, I can't seem to find any false positives.
- lsb 17y agoUnrelatedly, one of the challenges in analyzing modern text with traditional NLP tools is that the tools usually expect standard English, whereas the text is rather colloquial, and the punctuation is for timing purposes, when present at all.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- tedunangst 17y ago"How is babby formed?" -> Text is not likely to be stupid. Incorrect.
- mahmud 17y agoThat question could be about the stages of fetus development, which is not an stupid thing to ponder.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- RyanMcGreal 17y agoThey need to do way instain filter>
- jpeterson 17y agoThis looks stupid to you because you see it in the context of a stupid meme. When seen this way: How is <unknown word> formed? It doesn't look stupid at all.
- tedunangst 17y agoA stupidity filter that doesn't block stupid memes is not a stupidity filter.
- pierrefar 17y agoI posted "This is stupid" into the demo ( http://stupidfilter.org/demo.php http://stupidfilter.org/demo.php ) and it said "Text is not likely to be stupid."
- smallblacksun 17y agofirst! is classified as "not likely to be stupid", which shows how much work it needs.
- tcskeptic 17y agoIt probably just indicates that they have not pointed it at Slashdot comments as a training set yet.
- eggoa 17y agoI hope this doesn't end up equating having English as a second language with supidity.
- Emore 17y agoThis is, apparently, not likely to be stupid: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- NickM 17y agoIf something like this was actually used, I predict we would just see a shift from "I'm in ur base, killin ur doods" to "I am in your base, and I am in the process of killing your dudes."
- CulturalNgineer 17y agoI put in "Goldman Sachs is crooked" as a query...and it returned: "Text in not likely to be stupid" Clearly this is a very perceptive algorithm!