3 ms·

Google Fiber prioritizes municipalities that make it easy to get things done. San Francisco makes it very, very difficult to get things done.

• dluan 12y ago
  How is Comcast doing it? And is it in a particularly non-Google way?
  • raldi 12y ago
    They started the process 35 years ago. When broadband internet became a thing, their cables were already in the ground, and they already had long-established underground and pole rights-of-way.
    • boyaka 12y ago
      Born and lived most of my life in the Bay Area. My Dad got us @Home cable Internet, which is the same infrastructure Comcast currently uses, in around 1997 when it first became available. It eventually became AT&T broadband Internet (attbi), and then Comcast bought it (IIRC, might be missing something). My older brother heard about Napster right when it came out and I remember getting very impressive download speeds (I think I saw it get to 600 KB/s or 1 MB/s at some point). We were also part of the batch of people that got banned for uploading Metallica mp3s. After that I found GNUtella (although I had no clue what GNU was at the time, just heard about it as an alternative service) and Kazaa. I also moved on to mIRC to get mainly anime and music videos. All in the late 90s, early 2000s. The infrastructure has served us very well! I don't really know about the laws, but I assume the issue in municipalities is laying down new infrastructure, even though you'd think Comcast monopoly is more of an issue.
    • dluan 12y ago
      Interesting, thanks for the answer! Is it a local policy? Could there a be a proposition at the local level to change or overturn this?