3 ms·
This article seems to make no point, and certainly doesn't answer the question. It gives examples of tech firms doing things differently, then it gives three ex
by CHY872 12y ago
This article seems to make no point, and certainly doesn't answer the question. It gives examples of tech firms doing things differently, then it gives three examples of tech firms doing things that regulators frown on, and signs off by making a true comment that applies in specific cases, and probably not to any company mentioned in the article.
You could write a similar article about any industry that has both positive and negative stories.
- yesiamyourdad 12y agoHardly qualifies as an article. It's what, 4 paragraphs? The funny thing is that I remember an article on Microsoft in the late 90s where the author predicted MS' demise would come due to its arrogance. In particular, because an interview subject at MS didn't respond to voicemails. It's easy to look at a company that's coming under regulatory scrutiny, accuse them of arrogance, and then smugly nod your head when the regulators impose sanctions.