2 ms·
On point 1: if a woman says she feels excluded, then it's exclusionary. It's not up to you to decide how she feels or tell her how she should feel. On point
by Frondo 12y ago
On point 1: if a woman says she feels excluded, then it's exclusionary. It's not up to you to decide how she feels or tell her how she should feel.
On point 2: I can't even dignify that "libel" remark with a response.
- DanBC 12y agoSnesker is a holocaust denying troll. The fact that this comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9200905 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9200905 is still live and wasn't heavily downvoted says something about the current HN audience.
- Frondo 12y agoWow. Thanks for pointing that out.
- Snesker 12y agoWhat part of my comment do you object to? Challenging the official story of the alleged holocaust DOES cost you your freedom in Germany, and also to a lesser extent in Canada. Do you think it should be a crime to disagree with the government? With Jews? With the 'general consensus'? Furthermore, my remark doesn't prove in the least that I'm a troll or a holocaust denier. Use your logic. The fact that your comment is still live and wasn't heavily downvoted says something about the current HN audience.
- Snesker 12y agoSomeone feeling excluded does not make something exclusionary. It's not up to you to decide someone's opinion is objective fact [i]simply because they're a woman, I might add[/i].
- Snesker 12y agoSomeone feeling excluded does not make something exclusionary. It's not up to you to decide someone's opinion is objective fact [i]simply because they're a woman, I might add[/i]. edit: I find it interesting that, while you're complaining about exclusion, you jumped at the first opportunity to exclude me by accepting that I'm a 'holocaust-denying troll'. Well, not interesting. Aggravating. edit edit: I think I put it in the right spot this time