5 ms·
In a sense, companies that offer developers a salary plus equity or stock options are doing something similar. You get a certain amount up front, which is not
by jawns 12y ago
In a sense, companies that offer developers a salary plus equity or stock options are doing something similar. You get a certain amount up front, which is not contingent on the company's success (i.e., you get to keep your paycheck even if the business eventually goes belly-up), plus the possibility of more if the company does very well.
Other industries do this, too. When I was offered a book deal, I was given an advance, which was not contingent on sales. But, if I my book sells past a certain threshold, I'll start earning more royalties. (So please, buy a couple dozen copies.)
In fact, any business that offers a base salary plus some sort of additional compensation if certain targets are met (e.g. bonuses) are following this sort of model.
Edit: Now that I think about it, all the photogs are doing by charging based on circulation is a version of per-user licensing. Only unlike in software, the "users" are the people who see the advertisement.
- rosege 12y agoYes you're right its like MS CALs. Pay x amount for the server then also the CALs for each user/device. It really makes it apparent that work that produces IP is a special category of work. I keep imagining if other non-IP producing professionals tried to do charge in a similar manner how it would appear ridiculous (In some cases)