4 ms·
More important than good code is shipped code. I'd say about half my bad code is due to inexperience, what the post is referring to. As time goes on it DOES ge
by jackreichert 12y ago
More important than good code is shipped code.
I'd say about half my bad code is due to inexperience, what the post is referring to. As time goes on it DOES get better, especially since -- like most of you -- I'm constantly reading and trying to improve my skills.
The other half of my bad code is due to time constraint. This is either because a quick hack is needed, or the proper planning time is not allocated to do a proper job.
This leads me back to my initial statement. Sometimes you just need to get the job done. If you're not good enough to do it right, but you hack it and it works, that's good enough for now.
This is how systems get built poorly and bloat up, but there are deadlines and requirements that need to be met, and if you never ship, you'll never get the budget to rebuild that old system you allowed to get unwieldy. It's a constant struggle to balance quality, functionality, and deadlines.
- kgabis 12y agohttps://i.imgflip.com/kc24o.jpg https://i.imgflip.com/kc24o.jpg (Sorry for commenting in a form of a meme, but it really was asking for it)
- jackreichert 12y agoVery valid point. But not every product, as much as the stakeholder would like to believe, is a space shuttle.