4 ms·
I think a good solution to this would be to have it display the command it's going to run with a y/n prompt. It would only add one extra keystroke and make the
by Arcsech 12y ago
I think a good solution to this would be to have it display the command it's going to run with a y/n prompt. It would only add one extra keystroke and make the utility a lot safer. I think I'll make a pull request or fork or something that does this this weekend if somebody hasn't already by then.
- DougBTX 12y agoIf it defaulted to yes, then running it would be, fuck<return><return> which is probably good enough. (Pressing the same key twice is pretty much the same as pressing one key, but pressing two different keys is harder.)
- vitoreiji 12y agoI used to alias `rm` to `rm -i`, until I realized that I just pressed <return><y><return> without thinking.