4 ms·
I get it, it's a great article but I don't think we need to share the same article and discuss it annually. 2 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5
by mathetic 11y ago
I get it, it's a great article but I don't think we need to share the same article and discuss it annually.
2 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5519158 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5519158
3 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3439772 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3439772
6 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1060176 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1060176
7 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=191235 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=191235
8 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43243 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43243
Keep in mind these are the ones with decent number of comments. There are two pages of submissions with the exact same title.
- escherize 11y agoThis is a problem with time-decay voting content systems and evergreen content. It happens on reddit as well.
- maerF0x0 11y agoWe need a sidebar w/ prereq "must reads"
- gtCameron 11y ago> I get it, it's a great article but I don't think we need to share the same article and discuss it annually. Serious question - Why not?