Relying on a source that is basically a propaganda organ of the hard right elements of the Republican party without disclosing that is what it is falls under "d

Relying on a source that is basically a propaganda organ of the hard right elements of the Republican party without disclosing that is what it is falls under "dishonesty" when attempting to use it as a factual representation of reality. It is IDENTICAL to me going to a SJW and using her as a source without fact checking it. Or the Rolling Stone article. He literally did that. It isn't a fact you can wave away and say "Well, conservative republican views are becoming mainstream so its okay." All he had to do was add a footnote saying "Hey look at these Republican political operatives".