You're not really refuting any of his points, you only compared it to "MRA literature" to deflect from having to actually form a counter argument. It's the same

You're not really refuting any of his points, you only compared it to "MRA literature" to deflect from having to actually form a counter argument. It's the same as when the "MRAs" compare feminism to nazism. >There's no discussion to be had That's the problem. SJWs don't want to discuss anything, just point fingers while sitting atop their high-horse. >a refusal to listen to reason and instead substitute your own perception of how the world works. It sounds to me like you're using the same exact rhetoric that the "MRAs" use against the SJWs. Personally I think the article is very well thought out and I've seen first hand how self described "social justice warriors" can be completely authoritarian, racist, and bigoted.