> $334 million just 3 years ago and now simply shutting it down? Sunk cost. The question isn't how much it cost how recently, the question is how much burn the

> $334 million just 3 years ago and now simply shutting it down? Sunk cost. The question isn't how much it cost how recently, the question is how much burn they have before there is a chance of making money. If there is not much chance, why burn more resources on it?