> Net neutrality ensures network operators don’t discriminate by limiting access to services you want to use. Internet.org provides some services for free and

> Net neutrality ensures network operators don’t discriminate by limiting access to services you want to use. Internet.org provides some services for free and other services... not at all. That certainly sounds like "limiting access" to me. He's saying they don't limit access to other services since you can keep paying for them exactly as you are now... which is exactly the same as the argument that speeding up traffic from some sources doesn't hurt anyone, since it's not like they're slowing down traffic from others; you can keep getting it exactly as you are now. This is what net neutrality is all about. How can a non-free service compete on a level playing field with a privileged, free service (of which Facebook is one, naturally)?