19 ms·
WikiLeaks publishes 30,000 leaked Sony documents
- JackWebbHeller 12y agohttps://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/139607 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/139607 So it would seem Scott Forstall (of Apple) is now an advisor to Snapchat, and owns 0.11% of the stock... I'd been wondering what he'd been up to after Apple.
- randomname2 12y agohttps://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/135225 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/135225 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/49813 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/49813 Nice, forcing the execs to chime in to a $50.000 bribe
- hurin 12y agoWhat's the actual legal status on this? It definitely seems to circumvent the law - but is it clearly criminal? Have such abuses been prosecuted successfully in the past?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- eli 12y agoI don't see how it's fundamentally any different from a pro-life group wanting to donate to a pro-life candidate and then celebrating the passage of a pro-life law. Of course you want to support candidates who look after your interests. As long as there is no quid pro quo (e.g. the $50k was a fee for passing the initiative and it wouldn't have happened otherwise). IANAL.
- task_queue 12y agoThere are limitations on donations. They wanted to donate $50k. By law, they can't do that. So they manipulated how they donated that sum to circumvent that law.
- azinman2 12y agoBut it's not quite the same as sony still giving it up. Their execs had to pay out of their own pocket. I'm actually glad to see that they cared about the law at all, and there was some level of effectiveness to it!
- eli 12y agoNonsense. They didn't "manipulate" anything. The company made a legal donation and they asked employees to make additional donations up to a certain target amount from the employee's own funds. It's perfectly legal to email your coworkers about a political campaign and to ask them to donate. Does this kind of suck? Maybe. Is campaign finance a mess? Definitely. But would you really want a federal law that restricts what you can say about political campaigns while at work? I'm not even sure the Constitution would permit such a restriction on speech.
- yincrash 12y agoPlease describe how this is a bribe.
- quonn 12y agoHow is it not? This seems to be the normal state of affairs in US elections, but that doesn't change a thing.
- fnordfnordfnord 12y agoYou're right. It's not even a quid pro quo if a contract stating the scope and purpose of the "donations" isn't attached. /s People here are just jumping on the bandwagon and assuming some very unkind things about the politicians and the executives alike; and that's just not fair.
- c0ur7n3y 12y agoAre you suggesting they didn't expect anything in return for their money?
- lttlrck 12y agoIsn't getting something in return (tangible or not) for supporting an aligned cause the entire point of supporting it in the first place?
- netcan 12y agoThe argument for classifying this as bribery (or some other form of inappropriate transfer of money to an elected official) is the same as the argument for the existence of the law that they are circumventing. IE, there is a 5k limit for corporate donations. No problem, lets have $50k of private donations directed by a corporation. He laid it out pretty plainly. We need to get this guy 5k, but that's illegal so lets do it this sneaky way. It may be illegal (probably not, but maybe). If it isn't illegal it should be. It's a practice that renders the practice ineffective. Imagine you are a in corporate sales. IBM buyers are allowed to accept up to $500 worth goodies from any one salesman, but no more. So, you get all your buddies to chip in. If their manager found out, they would assume that this buyers is compromised, unethical and should be fired and investigated for possible prosecution. The policy needs to be updated, but there is an obvious workaround at play here. Honestly, I don't even see how this is controversial. How can people see massive political donations (which are crucial to getting elected) in such circumstances as anything but a circumvention of democracy. This is not just, I really am shocked.
- davidslv 12y agoWhat's the big deal? Why do you care about those documents so much? They all seem really meaningless, but maybe I'm missing the point... someone enlighten me?
- onion2k 12y agoHere's an example: https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/112147 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/112147 In 2014 Sony's German website was hacked and a file was replaced that served malware. The site inlcuded a database of 50,000 people's names and email addresses. Sony didn't tell anyone there had been a hack. The news of it broken in December[1] because of Wikileaks. Corporations cover up things that affect their customers. That is wrong. [1] http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2014/12/15/sony-pictures-germany-hacked-in-january/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2014/12/15/sony-p...
- curiously 12y agoWhy don't you care?
- ajkjk 12y agoIf you don't care about anything political you won't care about this. But, surely, you must understand that other people do care about those things and therefore would care about this.
- whoopdedo 12y agoBut is this really political? In that this is information that is beneficial to a democratic society to have out in the open? Or is it something being done to embarrass a political rival which only serves the interest of a single party? Because it really looks to me more like the later. Not that I feel sorry for Sony, but do they as a private-sector company not have a right to privacy? There's been a lot of talk lately about wanting to improve the state of privacy on the internet. Through pervasive encryption, controls on data collection, net neutrality, and limiting government surveillance. And then, because Sony happens to be unpopular, they get hacked and data stolen from them. I'm supposed to celebrate this breach of privacy? This tells me that if I value my own privacy I should be careful not to do anything that makes Julian Assange unhappy. So no, I'm not going to join in the anti-Sony lynch mob. Privacy, like free speech, is something that if you value it for yourself you must defend it at all times, even if you disagree with who is using it.
- trebla 12y agoOh, so they are finally making a film about Tesla. Cool. https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/86961 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/86961
- pervycreeper 12y agoThey didn't make the entire archive available to download?
- mightymaike 12y agoThere used to be an archive from WL where you could download all the raw material.
- kristofferR 12y agoThey discussed using Civil Forfeiture and the Economic Espionage Act to steal the Slysoft.com domain from Slysoft: https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/05/docs/AACS/Litigation/Outline%20for%20Website%20seizure%20argument.DOC.pdf https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/05/docs/AACS/Litigation/Outl...
- fnordfnordfnord 12y agoThis is where I expect an attorney to step ITT and chortle about how companies and individuals have no power or influence over the government's laying of criminal charges.
- randomname2 12y agohttps://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/132611 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/132611 Sony CEO Michael Lynton was already pitching press secretary Jay Carney on his last day at the White House
- randomname2 12y agoSony CEO Michael Lynton and Presidential Advisor Valerie Jarrett being very "cozy" https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/?q=Valerie+and+Jarret*&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/?q=Valerie+and+Jarret*&mfr...
- plongeur 12y agoWhere?
- alfiedotwtf 12y ago"dotcom": https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/?q=dotcom&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/?q=dotcom&mfrom=&mto=&titl...
- plongeur 12y agoWhat database system is WikiLeaks using for querying those texts and documents?
- ExpiredLink 12y agoWhy do people here applaud to this activity?
- stefantalpalaru 12y agoBecause they have not been properly educated to fully appreciate our corporate overlords. I, for one, welcome Sony's involvement in politics, their relentless subversion of free trade agreements to impose rent-seeking behavior on intellectual property, their wise usage of public money to pursue evil pirates and the "wag the dog" campaign against North Korea to distract attention from security policies and an upcoming box office flop.
- chippy 12y agoPeople may agree with some of the ideas on the Wikileaks about page. https://wikileaks.org/About.html https://wikileaks.org/About.html
- revelation 12y agoBecause this stuff is incredibly important? Because, as it turns out, most things in this world are not decided on merit or logic or laws, but in social systems and a big big helping of inertia? Frankly, we should require every company to turn over it's archives after a 20 year or so grace period. This is extremely helpful in a quest to understand how the world actually works, and not archiving and analyzing it dooms us to continue the mistakes of past generations. You ask why there are not more women studying STEM or in CEO positions? Well, answers inside, partially. Pick any other social issue, you'll learn something here. Stuff like this and the diplomatic cables should be required reading in schools. Otherwise students could get the idea that what you read in a newspaper or hear in an interview reflects reality in any way. The best way to teach critical thinking is to show people how friendships and informal alliances and intrigue are the principal components of any decision process.
- einrealist 12y agoThis unacceptable and outright disgusting. For me, Wikileaks lost all credibility. It is wrong to violate the privacy and confidentiality of employees and contacts of the company. It does not matter if there are clues of wrongdoing or if somebody calls the contents trivial. Government ties, connections to the military industry and support for politicians? How is that a scandal? And how is that worth violating people's rights. Nothing is redacted. Nothing is explained in context. This is awful. If something is worth a scandal, it's the chutzpa of Wikileaks.
- xroche 12y ago> Government ties You mean, corruption ? Yes, this is worth publishing. Even if this corruption has become mainstream.
- einrealist 12y agoYour interpretation of corruption may not be equal to its lawful meaning. If you have a problem with the donations to for example Cuomo, than you can lobby for change (e.g. by donating to a politician who shares your view). Again, there is no reason for violating people's rights even when they can be _accused_ of wrongdoing. It is for courts to decide.
- toyg 12y agoCan you see the irony in your comment? "If you'd like to change a certain behaviour, you should indulge in that same behaviour as much as you can." How do you fix a broken process, if the only way to do it is going through the same broken process?
- einrealist 12y agoThat was intended. We all know that there are problems with the balance of influence. But that does not excuse the publishings.
- Lorento 12y ago
- steamy 12y agoSony Corp is a private business. It is not a public institution so we can go after them and expose their dirty laundry to the public. I can't understand WikiLeaks anymore. They seem now like teenage trolls with infantile attitude and manners.
- antiall 12y agoGood job WikiLeaks, I applaud it. We already know fulltime employees are sitting on this site trying to spread lies.
- drapper 12y ago"This archive shows the inner workings of an influential multinational corporation. It is newsworthy and at the centre of a geo-political conflict. It belongs in the public domain." Yeah, right. Some of is of public interest, sure, but then find it, edit it and publish the results. Ah, I forgot, it's not how wikileaks operate. For them making everything public is good in itself (except, of course, when it's about themselves).
- nitrogen 12y agoThe armchair historian and anthropologist in me wishes we had something like this for the corporations of the 1800s. To a historian or anthropologist, the mundane, everyday interactions are every bit as important to study as the momentous occasions.
- frozenport 12y agoMy browser history might be useful, but I dont want you looking at it until my children are dead.
- borgia 12y ago>The armchair historian and anthropologist in me wishes we had something like this for the corporations of the 1800s. What we do have from this time though are a huge number of private journals written/kept by very powerful and influential people. We also have huge troves of their mail correspondence that, without a doubt, was intended to be kept private. We have since made these things public, written books about them, published the letters reprinted, etc. So perhaps the release of such correspondence is merely a function of the time since its authorship, or the time since the author (and recipient?) died. The way things operate today though, the future historians are unlikely to get such content.
- hownottowrite 12y agoFun anecdote: Amazon's game with Hachette cost Malcolm Gladwell more than $50k per month. https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/127944 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/127944 Disappointing fact: Gladwell uses a Blackberry
- appleflaxen 12y agoYou should look into Gladwell's history with big tobacco; I lost respect for him after I came across it, and don't mind at all that he lost $50k as a result of the Hachette issue.
- cm2187 12y agoI thought the initial concept of wikileaks was to publish documents that would reveal scandals. Instead it is becoming a pirate bay for stolen documents. I am sure the leaks of the Sony documents will reveal the nasty side of Hollywood (which are well known, Hollywood made hundreds of movies on that topic!), but how is that a matter of public interest? What scandal will come out of this? Even the diplomatic cables didn't really reveal any major wrong doing. Most documents were, at most, of interest to diplomats and historians. But no major scandal came out of these leaks. Too often wikileaks is compared to the Snowden leaks, which triggered a rightful outrage.
- hurin 12y agoI tend to agree - the documents relating to actual abuses are worth releasing, - but releasing the entire trove (and granted I haven't looked at all of it) seems arbitrary and without principal.
- tete 12y agoAre you seriously asking how revealing corruption in politics is in the public interest? https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/135225 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/135225
- eli 12y agoYou needed leaked emails to tell you that companies donate to political candidates they like? https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00282038 https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.php?strID=C00282038
- task_queue 12y agoIf you read a follow up email here: https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/49813 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/49813 You will be aware of the damning evidence. They intended to donate $50k. They are subject to a $5k donation limitation. They are deliberately skirting the law.
- coderdude 12y agoI'm very surprised that HN moderators allowed this to stay on the front page for 10 hours. I know it would not have stayed on the front page if it was about Sony [YC S15]. I honestly don't know who they're trying to appeal to these days.
- steve19 12y agoCan you imagine the conspiracy theories that Assange would be spewing on twitter if his emails were hacked and published. He would demonize the hackers, accuse the CIA, the NSA, MI5/6 etc. of colluding, and his friends at the Guardian would be writing pages of vitriol railing against the hackers/cia/nsa/mi5. But Hollywood screwed Assange with The Fifth Estate so now they are fair game. He would have prefered to publish Disney emails, but this leaks plenty of conversations about Disney, or that reference Disney, so I guess its good enough. I thought Wikileaks jumped the shark with "Collateral Murder", but this just about puts them in the same league as the worst elements of the NSA. If Sony broke the law, they could have selectively published those emails. Yesterday is was the military, todays is large corporations, next I guess Wikileaks will publish the accounts of prominent individuals they don't like. For the record, I think any mainstream media that republish these emails are just as bad as Wikileaks.
- hnnewguy 12y ago>If Sony broke the law, they could have selectively published those emails. I think the point is to not be selective. Release the info, and let people do with it as they may.
- pjc50 12y agoQV the UK press "hacking" scandals. The problem is the role of press and activists as a sort of citizen's law enforcement branch. The rule of law is not strong enough that crimes committed by powerful individuals, companies, militaries, and so on will be actually investigated. So scandals must be uncovered from the outside. But the public is also quite hungry for non-illegal scandal. WRT "Collateral Murder", what do you think is the correct way to investigate war crimes when you know the military involved will not punish them internally?
- steve19 12y agoI dont have any issue with publishing the video. I have issue with them spinning it. And they did not just spin it, they edited it for effect. Pointing at other corrupt organizations and saying they also have done wrong that went unpunished (although as far as I know the UK hacking did not go unpublished), does not justify doing wrong. The irony of course is that Assange is hiding in London precisely to avoid appearing in court. But I also acknowledge we all have a different set of morals. For some the ends justifies the means. I personally believe the ends never justify the means. The ends justifies the means is usually what war criminals claim to be their justification.
- nitrogen 12y agoI've seen multiple comments complain about the lack of a "scandal", using that same word. Why does something have to be scandalous to be worth preserving for history's sake? Such an archival strategy will lead to us never learning from the successes and failures of the past, because they've all been exaggerated into a series of unreachable highs and lamentable lows. The actions of the hackers who tried to blackmail Sony and stole the documents are wholly unjustifiable. But now that the damage has been done, there is incredible historic and sociological value in seeing what "normal" means inside of a major media corporation.
- Lancey 12y agoI agree with this wholeheartedly. WikiLeaks doesn't exist just to publish scandals. It's not a tabloid or a nightly news show. It's a website that publishes leaked documents, and this is the biggest leak of the decade. Making it searchable and accessible is the icing on the cake.
- rhino369 12y agoInherent in this argument is that privacy is worth nothing or at least less than the small insight into a company. I find it odd that there is a large overlap in people who support "Transparency" and those who are very big into "privacy." They are contradictory principles in my mind.
- nitrogen 12y agoPrivacy for individuals, transparency for large institutions. Like I said I don't support the hacking at all. But the data now exists, and much can be learned therefrom.
- rfreytag 12y agoLooking for a downloadable PostgreSQL or MySQL database, git archive, or gzipped tarball. Anyone point me to one? Searched of course: https://www.google.com/#q=site:wikileaks.org+download+sony+archive&safe=active https://www.google.com/#q=site:wikileaks.org+download+sony+a... Seems that Wikileaks is bearing unnecessary cost in hosting the search interface in addition to publishing.
- Lancey 12y agoCorporations are people now, so they should probably get used to having their privacy infringed upon.
- gtirloni 12y agoShould the EFF fight _for_ Sony then? :-)
- tete 12y agoWell, if they don't have money and someone wants to unlawfully sue or even imprison them or someone wants to collect health data, sexual preferences, etc., I am sure they would. Other than that. Sony can freely use HTTPS Everywhere, Tor, Switzerland[software], etc., which are supported by EFF. Would be great if they did.
- fnordfnordfnord 12y agoSure, add their name to the bottom of the list.
- mayneack 12y agoyikes: https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/101702 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/101702
- gtirloni 12y agoThe public didn't need to know that this woman's mother was trying to find her a new job and, probably out of ignorance about the whole Sony vs World situation, contacted someone at Sony about it. But I guess WikiLeaks doesn't care, as long as it hits Sony directly. If only they could take a lesson from Snowden.
- longlivegnu 12y agoWikileaks has been like this for a while
- 12y ago
- genmon 12y agoUnrelated to Sony, but related to WikiLeaks... Andrew O'Hagen was tapped to ghostwrite Julian Assange's autobiography. It didn't work out. The story behind why, and the insights into workings Wikileaks and the personality of Assange, are incredible: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n05/andrew-ohagan/ghosting http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n05/andrew-ohagan/ghosting Great long long long read.
- xnull2guest 12y agoI don't have time to read this, care to share a summary of why it's incredible?
- wslh 12y agoSearching for e-mails and documents related to BitTorrent: https://search.wikileaks.org/advanced?q=bittorrent&exclude_words=&words_title_only=&words_content_only=&publication_type%5B%5D=26&sort=0#results https://search.wikileaks.org/advanced?q=bittorrent&exclude_w...
- kpcyrd 12y agoThis one looks interesting: https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/05/docs/Anti-Piracy/IP%20Obfuscation%20v0.7.pdf https://wikileaks.org/sony/docs/05/docs/Anti-Piracy/IP%20Obf...
- kristofferR 12y ago"Several years ago the studios brought siteblocking litigation in Norway to test that country’s implementation of EU Copyright Directive Article 8.3. We lost the case and as a result of lobbying, Norway implemented a specific law this past summer embodying the 8.3 siteblocking requirements." "As a result of lobbying, Norway implemented a specific law" https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/114787 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/114787
- eli 12y agoWere you under the impression that lobbyists weren't supposed to advocate for specific laws?
- kristofferR 12y agoThere's a big difference between arguing your case in public on equal terms with your opponents and one side manipulating the politicians behind closed doors. It's scary that a company in effect can write and pass laws, without the public being involved.
- eli 12y agoSounds like you're against lobbying in general, which is fine, but I'm not sure this is a smoking gun of any wrongdoing. I assume the law was passed through Norway's standard (public) legislative process.
- dewitt 12y agoAbsolutely shameful that WikiLeaks would choose to publish stolen, private correspondence, and frankly I'm surprised and disappointed there are people in the HN community that don't seem have an issue with it. Even if you supported the publishing of the NSA documents on the grounds that it was whistle-blowing, and thus aided in uncovering a greater crime, there's no such possible justification here. (Certainly not in publishing them in bulk.) We have due process for the discovery of private communication, and that process protects all of us. In fact, our personal freedoms depends on our consistent application of those protections, regardless of whether they're being use to protect you, me, our best friend, or someone we don't even like. If we decide that it's up to thieves to decide what we do or do not get to keep private in our own lives, then we'll have fallen so far as a society. Good luck when they come for you next. (Personal request: since this is obviously a polarized topic, consider posting your rebuttal as a comment, so everyone including me can learn more about the nuances of the debate.)
- Lancey 12y agoYou act like WikiLeaks is some sort of guardian angel of the internet. I don't think they have to justify their actions as right or good because that's not the purpose of the site to begin with. WikiLeaks publishes information. It's not a force for good or bad, but a resource that can be used to change the world. They didn't steal the information, but they collected it. They've done no wrong in presenting it this way. I understand why you're angry - people were deceived and their (believed private) conversations were made public. But blame the hackers, the internet, Sony's infosec team, or the executives that prompted this breach. WikiLeaks had nothing to do with it.
- GabrielF00 12y agoThey are absolutely complicit in a gross violation of privacy. I've spent some time looking through the emails. There's information about people's health (I found an email where one person informs colleagues that he was recently diagnosed with cancer), personal correspondence, a record of purchases, privileged legal documents, etc. By using their megaphone to give these documents publicity, by making them easily accessible and searchable, Wikileaks is absolutely complicit and has done wrong.
- zer0rest 12y agoInformation wants to be free.
- venomsnake 12y agoI love the sony PR damage control in this topic. Keep up the good work. There has been no invasion of privacy. These are all work emails. And if some corporation that is member of MPAA and RIAA gets destroyed - the better.
- ikeboy 12y ago>40,000 social Security numbers leaked? These were not only work emails.
- GlickWick 12y agoAre you kidding me? These are not just work emails. In 15 minutes of reading I've found personal communications, medical issues, people confiding in a friend over marital problems, etc. This is 2015. People use their work email for personal communications. Should they? Probably not. However, any reasonable person knows that most people do this. Sony isn't going to get "destroyed" over this, sorry. A bunch of innocent mid-level employees just trying to support their families just got wrecked, though! Woo, we did it internet! As someone who considers himself far-left leaning, this shit just embarrasses me.
- codecondo 12y agoOf course they are just work emails, the content of those emails might not be, but at the bottom all these emails come from the corporate system that workers to this corporation were assigned, so once again -- these are only work emails.
- GlickWick 12y agoSorry, that's not how the world works. HN is so hypocritical. NSA accused of spying on peoples private data? Get out the pitchforks! Tons of innocent peoples private lives leaked by Assange? Woo! We did it Hacker News! We showed them! Get a grip, guys. You sound like a bunch of insane people.
- codecondo 12y ago
- stephan2000 12y agoSearch "propaganda" https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/?q=propaganda&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/?q=propaganda&mfrom=&mto=&...
- xnull2guest 12y agoIt's amazing that so much pro-Israel (and anti anti-Israel) content, news, analysis and perspectives are traded at SONY including the TIP "NGO". Anyone know who Pascal or Amy are? It also cropped up some goodies: "They mention that it was a sony executive that told them to not use a fictitious name, but to go with kim jong-un - They mention that a former cia agent and someone who used to work for Hilary Clinton looked at the script - this might all be fine, but this is all info that the journalists have at this time." "This was the first of the important article re; the subject for our doc that appeared in the British press this summer during the Gaza crisis. I think we will get full cooperation from the impt media in europe, the eu, the current conservative govt. in the uk, the current govt in france, angela merkel in germany, many academics ( def at Oxford, Cambridge, LSE ) and of course, major jewish orgs in the uk france germany and in most eu countries .......... during the high holidays this year, no synagogue in britain or jewish school did not have police protection and private security provided by the cst ( the community security trust, an organization created to report hate crime and provide security to synagogues etc ...... kind of an armed ADL ...... funded by Sir Gerald Ronson ) The same for synagogues in every major European city. The threat here is very real ....... in certain parts of London ....... even an American accent is commented on ........ negatively, since thebombing of Isis has begun. This documentary is an essential tool for spreading our message. Ron"
- conjugate 12y agowhere can you download the whole thing?
- peterkelly 12y agoI found this one rather ironic: https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/70993 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/70993 > "Subject: SPE Email Retention Policy > Email Retention > SPE’s email retention period is two years." They might want to rethink that. Or perhaps use encryption. > "There should be no expectation of privacy when you use SPE’s email system" Indeed. I don't condone this leak. But it's explicitly stated in their policy that these emails should not be considered private. They might want to rethink that one too.
- kyboren 12y agoTo: Amy Pascal From: GC <batmansenior@me.com> [note: George Clooney] Subject: "Re: knowing this email is being hacked" ... And so you know... According to Scotland Yard.... We are being hacked. So I'll give you a secure address... Now this is gonna be fun. https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/31233 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/31233
- mentat 12y agohttps://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/20615 https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/20615 - digital alteration of The Interview