4 ms·
Ah, now that's a different discussion :) Yes, I was wondering about that. Mendel I think would belong on that list; I think membership in it depends upon fund
by duncan_bayne 12y ago
Ah, now that's a different discussion :) Yes, I was wondering about that. Mendel I think would belong on that list; I think membership in it depends upon fundamentally changing a field, rather than 'just' significantly improving it.