2 ms·
Those other locations still be susceptible to stray radio transmissions, especially an Earth orbit which would also have issues with Earth's ionosphere. All th
by drzaiusapelord 12y ago
Those other locations still be susceptible to stray radio transmissions, especially an Earth orbit which would also have issues with Earth's ionosphere. All that moon rock is going to be a great radio insulator.
I also imagine there are cost savings by having it sit on the surface of a moon than being its own satellite. No need for worry about orbit corrections or strict weight limitations. The Tsiolkovskiy crater is pretty flat and would make a good candidate for a telescope which would have long antenna arrays laying on the surface.
- snowwrestler 12y agoI doubt there are cost savings in siting it on the lunar surface. Yes you save on station-keeping, but it's very costly and dangerous to descend into a gravity well like that. Weight is definitely still important to make sure it doesn't hit too hard. L2 point would give you almost all the benefits with a lot less risk and cost.