Isn't machine learning a first step towards "how to train itself" ? Honestly, I would say "chatbot" is a class of primitive AI - I'd also class Eliza as an (ex

Isn't machine learning a first step towards "how to train itself" ? Honestly, I would say "chatbot" is a class of primitive AI - I'd also class Eliza as an (extremely) primitive AI. I feel like you're making a distinction without a difference because you have some arbitrary barrier in mind for "sufficiently non-primitive to have earned the term AI" and are then applying that. Would "a chatbot with primitive AI capabilities" seem like a reasonable compromise definition?