3 ms·
Certainly, but comparing X-as-almost-never-practiced[1] to Y is pretty disingenuous unless you're going to very clearly state up front that that is what you're
by lomnakkus 12y ago
Certainly, but comparing X-as-almost-never-practiced[1] to Y is pretty disingenuous unless you're going to very clearly state up front that that is what you're doing.
Of course, the hackiness of X-as-practiced is a valid point of qualitative comparison and should indeed be brought up.
[1] Ok, I'm exaggerating a little. It's not quite "never", but most large sites where image loading time is an issue are using some form of workaround, be it spriting, multiple domains, or something else.
- kbenson 12y agoI think the point is that these sites get an efficient solution for free rather than spending time and resources on designing and implementing sharding. Just because it's common for sites with loading time constraints doesn't mean they wouldn't have been a whole lot happier to not have to have dealt with it.