3 ms·
In this case the performance measure in question is whether the latency is perceptible to humans or not. Milliseconds is the appropriate unit. Nobody is going t
by mrob 12y ago
In this case the performance measure in question is whether the latency is perceptible to humans or not. Milliseconds is the appropriate unit. Nobody is going to notice differences of less than 1ms.
- madez 12y agoAccumulation. If x is the unit of measure for the end-result and we have n components that add together, then we need at least x/n as unit of measure for the performance of each component. x/(2*n) is more reasonable to not deviate from the target performance more than one x after rounding in the worst-case.
- AndrewDucker 12y agoYes. But if some of your stages have delays of tens of milliseconds then there's no point knowing how big the delays are in the stages that are lower than 1 millisecond. Once they're all below 1ms it's worth increasing the resolution.
- chinathrow 12y agoWell, e.g. 20x 0.4ms (rounded to 0ms) is going to be noticed quite soon.