4 ms·
The fact that he deleted it implies they decided that wasn't the case after all, or at least wasn't the whole story. They didn't handle media very well this la
by tsotha 12y ago
The fact that he deleted it implies they decided that wasn't the case after all, or at least wasn't the whole story.
They didn't handle media very well this launch, what with the fumbled video release and then a retracted tweet.
- hahainternet 12y ago> The fact that he deleted it implies they decided that wasn't the case after all, or at least wasn't the whole story. It doesn't. That's just your impression you are placing upon the tweet. Deleting it says nothing when you are the head of multi billion dollar organisations. Perhaps he didn't want to give their competitors information that could help them model F9. > They didn't handle media very well this launch, what with the fumbled video release and then a retracted tweet. This is just ridiculous nitpicking. SpaceX usually gives us camera views from inside the goddamn LOX tanks on the stages. 'Didn't handle media very well' my arse.
- weego 12y agoDidn't handle the media well? Some dickhead multi-millionaire who puts all his money into hedge funds and is pretty much just a negative drain on humanity can worry about their media image but how about we let the people putting their money into building space rockets do the space rocket thing.
- ceejayoz 12y agoHe also deleted a tweet to John Carmack telling him to work for SpaceX. Don't read too much into a deletion.
- saraid216 12y agoMy read on the deletion is that they didn't want bad press going into the next attempted landing, which is going to be on land.