3 ms·
That's interesting, I thought it was a direct (joke) response to the "Go" vs "Go!" situation. The "Go!" author stated that his language came first and then we f
by sant0sk1 17y ago
That's interesting, I thought it was a direct (joke) response to the "Go" vs "Go!" situation. The "Go!" author stated that his language came first and then we find these conveniently aged commits the following day.
Either way, it's nice to see Google not taking itself too seriously.
- tvon 17y agoI could be completely wrong of course, and the timing is convenient. I guess it depends on when these changes were pushed in, but then it's hard to tell when a possibly fake timestamp was made...
- tedunangst 17y agoFinding a commit on one day doesn't mean the commit happened on that day.