4 ms·

I don't think this relates to the "Go" vs "Go!" situation, I think it's just meant to represent the evolution of Google Go as a language.

• sant0sk1 17y ago
  That's interesting, I thought it was a direct (joke) response to the "Go" vs "Go!" situation. The "Go!" author stated that his language came first and then we find these conveniently aged commits the following day. Either way, it's nice to see Google not taking itself too seriously.
  • tvon 17y ago
    I could be completely wrong of course, and the timing is convenient. I guess it depends on when these changes were pushed in, but then it's hard to tell when a possibly fake timestamp was made...
    • jerf 17y ago
      Possibly fake?
      • tvon 17y ago
        Yeah, that really didn't need to be added...
  • tedunangst 17y ago
    Finding a commit on one day doesn't mean the commit happened on that day.