3 ms·
Once again, have you even read the article that you pointed to? If so, what do you think about her plan to remove open source contributions from the hiring mix?
by hluska 12y ago
Once again, have you even read the article that you pointed to? If so, what do you think about her plan to remove open source contributions from the hiring mix? She suggests that when hiring, employers should:
a) Ask for code samples.
b) Pair as an interview.
c) Hire as a contractor before you make an offer of employment.
She does not dispute the existence of bias, rather she makes the point that valuing open source so heavily makes technology less of a meritocracy.
- yummyfajitas 12y ago(a) is an unbiased method analogous to blind orchestral auditions. (b) and (c) are not. (a) is also basically identical to hiring by github unless the candidate illegaly uses proprietary code as their sample. (From her article: "...not all programmers own the rights to their code..." in which case I can't look at it when hiring.) The entire article is about how using github (i.e. evaluating code with the human absent, i.e. the closest thing [1] we currently have to blind auditions) is "biased" against women. [1] Maybe we'll have something closer when starfighter comes out. I look forward to it.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]