4 ms·
It's still a problem with named parameters if the name doesn't dramatically break the symmetry between "true" and "false". Even if it does, booleans are still d
by tel 12y ago
It's still a problem with named parameters if the name doesn't dramatically break the symmetry between "true" and "false". Even if it does, booleans are still dangerous because they're harder to check statically.
- dllthomas 12y agoWhich isn't to say named parameters don't help a bunch over boolean positional parameters!