2 ms·
Ouch, hopefully doesn't turn into blaster 2.0. These days you're just asking for trouble if port 80 is open and you don't have a need for it, though.
by tdicola 12y ago
Ouch, hopefully doesn't turn into blaster 2.0. These days you're just asking for trouble if port 80 is open and you don't have a need for it, though.
- gtirloni 12y agoCouldn't parse the vulnerability name. Do you have a CVE number where I can find technical details about that?
- mukyu 12y agoBlaster[0] was a worm. It used CVE-2003-0352.[1] [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaster_%28computer_worm%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaster_%28computer_worm%29 [1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2003-0352 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2003-0352