3 ms·
More cross-sectional area because of lorentz contraction or just looking at the mass-surface area / kinetic energy ratio?
by deeviant 12y ago
More cross-sectional area because of lorentz contraction or just looking at the mass-surface area / kinetic energy ratio?
- TheLoneWolfling 12y agoWhoops, I messed up. Try 250^(2/3) times, instead. (I was intending to assume constant density and shape, but forgot to turn that into cross-sectional area as opposed to radius.)