> note that OP said "indirectly" The indirectly comment is referring to the CIA itself. Funding by IQT would thus be indirect versus funding by the CIA. The pr

> note that OP said "indirectly" The indirectly comment is referring to the CIA itself. Funding by IQT would thus be indirect versus funding by the CIA. The problem is there's no credible evidence of either, just fairly weak circumstantial stuff at best.