> Actually, there is no need for that. Type safety has nothing to do with software being more reliable or more secure. If you said this to me in an interview I

> Actually, there is no need for that. Type safety has nothing to do with software being more reliable or more secure. If you said this to me in an interview I would politely end the interview there and you would not be hired. A high school student with no programming knowledge at least can be taught. If you're confident in what you just said, you're both ignorant and unteachable. I really can think of no more scathing indictment of Go than this is the thinking of a typical Go user.