I can't find any place where the article claims the work will be for the same employer. It only claims people will not be out of work, so your whole objection i

I can't find any place where the article claims the work will be for the same employer. It only claims people will not be out of work, so your whole objection is a total straw man as you attack something the article doesn't claim. If you want to actually attack the position in the article, attack the proposition that there will be as much work available in all total work places in the future. This is definitely a position that is possible to attack, but instead you assumed people have to be employed at the same places as now. Such an attack would have to start with explaining why this time is different from earlier shifts of technology that has not had this effect (in the long term. Some have caused short term unemployment spikes).