4 ms·
> The manufactured goods will also need buyers, there's no end game where someone replaces all the workers with machines and then try to sell the output to... m
by 6d0debc071 12y ago
> The manufactured goods will also need buyers, there's no end game where someone replaces all the workers with machines and then try to sell the output to... machines?
If I were an evil factory owner, then I would replace my workers with machines and sell the produce of my factory to those providing the raw materials and to those owning other factories that produced goods that I wanted. It wouldn't be a matter of selling to the machines, it would be a matter of creating a closed market from which the means of production; including the copyrights and design of the machines, the expertise to operate them, and the raw materials necessary to create and operate them; never exited. In effect, everyone who did not own a machine, or was not part of a creative industry that produced art that matched my aesthetics, would simply become excess to requirements.
- TeMPOraL 12y agoA closed market system that will likely get smaller in time, or even eventually devoid of humans altogether. It's not hard to imagine that at some point the feedback loop will close over the automated economy and it will be able to function on its own, without any input from humans.
- 6d0debc071 12y agoIndeed, one seemingly plausible outcome is that the 1% starts complaining about the .1% . That the trend is uncapped given sufficient production multiplication ability... until one person ends up with a robot army and ownership over everything. We won't get there overnight, but how far we might get towards that extreme is worrying.