3 ms·
I'm not sure a home 'hub' is necessary, why can't HomeKit be a distributed service across all you devices? so your watch could still be a remote for the tv, or
by maniacalrobot 12y ago
I'm not sure a home 'hub' is necessary, why can't HomeKit be a distributed service across all you devices? so your watch could still be a remote for the tv, or the lights, or the front door, or the toaster …
- dynjo 12y agoFor HomeKit this is likely true, but I would still see it as a centerpiece for the home, also likely including Airport functionality.
- roc 12y agoI would like to be able to query device status and issue commands from across the internet. So some other device in my home will be acting as a 'hub'. So direct access sounds redundant at best, and more likely just a nightmare to configure and maintain. (Change your wifi network or password? Have fun updating a dozen devices. Get a new phone or watch? Have fun pairing to a dozen devices.) Beyond that, from a security standpoint, I'd rather smart devices didn't all have direct IP access. There are enough security concerns with the Internet-of-Things. Mitigating large swaths of those concerns appeals to me.