The bit about the rootkits proves little -- would he be qualified for his job if he WEREN'T interested in hacking? The rest, however, seems like enough to conv

The bit about the rootkits proves little -- would he be qualified for his job if he WEREN'T interested in hacking? The rest, however, seems like enough to convict him in the court of public opinion, including my opinion. Whether he should be convicted under the high standards of proof that prevail in a court of a law depends upon details not captured in the article.