My question is whether society is better served by 1) the destruction of excess money 2) preservation of meritocracy and furthermore, whether interests of chi

My question is whether society is better served by 1) the destruction of excess money 2) preservation of meritocracy and furthermore, whether interests of children of wealthy parents are better served through 1) leaving them oodles money 2) leaving them a society where a) things are affordable because there's less money chasing goods b) meritocracy reigns c) not to peg one's identity to money alone In the small, accumulation of money is a fine thing. In the large, you have corporations whom - in the name of profit - bribe, cajole governments and government agencies, that result in sending people to war, poisoning your food, and endorsing medicines that do not work. Setting a limit to the accumulation of a mere number means that humans can turn their attention towards other activities that are beneficial to society as a whole.