Really? 632(a)? This 632(a)?: >632. (a) Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, by means of an

Really? 632(a)? This 632(a)?: >632. (a) Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, by means of any electronic amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. The one that explicitly exempts radio devices? The type of devices that modern cellular phones are? And people are arguing about 'expectations of privacy' and 'explicit consent', when the actual statute uses 'confidential communication'? My phone calls are not confidential and they occur over radio devices. HN's behavior here is rather shameful.