4 ms·
You may be interpreting "bare metal" a little different than I intended. I meant for "bare metal" to increase the scope. It sounds like you interpret it as de
by mightybyte 17y ago
You may be interpreting "bare metal" a little different than I intended. I meant for "bare metal" to increase the scope. It sounds like you interpret it as decreasing the scope. Your use of "systems" sounds like what I meant for "bare metal". I interpret "systems" as relating primarily to operating systems and direct hardware, but maybe my perception is not mainstream. I guess I just chose the wrong phrase.
I agree that C now has a better controlling body. Those comments generally referred to the whole history of C and C++ combined.
- wglb 17y agoI see what you mean. Having spent some formative years writing assembler in an interrupt-rich environment has tended to shape my idea of bare metal.
- mightybyte 17y agoI edited the post to use the term "performance-oriented" instead of "bare-metal". Hopefully that makes more sense.