3 ms·
vim is very slow; "classic" vi, and more reasonable clones like nvi are much faster and that seems completely wrong to me. It also has terrible defaults (like k
by geocar 12y ago
vim is very slow; "classic" vi, and more reasonable clones like nvi are much faster and that seems completely wrong to me. It also has terrible defaults (like kindergarden-useless syntax highlighting which only make it slower!).
I have hopes that neovim will sort some of that out -- it makes a certain amount of sense that vim is slow because of some baggage it carries, but I'll admit they aren't very high hopes: I've been using emacs recently.
How funny is that? That I use emacs because vim is too slow!
- cturner 12y agoHaha. When I first this, I thought your problems might be from editing large files with syntax highlighting switched on. Or doing PHP or JSP, which I've found to struggle in the past. But then I saw the username. Indeed, if you're writing lots of code with hardly any newlines (like k lang), you will probably have performance issues with vim. > It also has terrible defaults This can vary from distribution-to-distribution. Certainly the default debian setup comes with annoyingly intrusive defaults, some of them used to have an impact on speed. Three settings you probably want in your $HOME/.vimrc on debian: filetype indent off filetype plugin off filetype plugin indent off [this might be obsolete - that config is more than a decade old]