4 ms·
For example, shared offices often use one IP address. If someone locks safe search there, it is locked for everyone. But as a small company that strives to offe
by dschobel 17y ago
For example, shared offices often use one IP address. If someone locks safe search there, it is locked for everyone.
But as a small company that strives to offer a real alternative to Google, we can deal with an IP based implementation.
So how does the DDG solution actually solve the problem?
- epi0Bauqu 17y agoIt doesn't.
- sgk284 17y agoWhat about parents who don't want filtered sites on their own computers, just on their kids? I think Google's approach is really reasonable. If you know how to clear cookies, you know how to go to a different search engine to find what you want. The colored balls also make it easy to check from a distance what your child is up to. I wouldn't want to be blocked based on IP, especially since it appears your implementation doesn't allow it to be undone. People search for porn, including parents. I like what DDG is up to, but this implementation is majorly flawed.