4 ms·

It's things like [1] that really irk me. Yes, they're working 'hard', yes they deserve compensation, no, there isn't any license conflicts (that I'm aware of) t

It's things like [1] that really irk me. Yes, they're working 'hard', yes they deserve compensation, no, there isn't any license conflicts (that I'm aware of) that would make selling eOS illegal, it's the fact that they wrote this justification to make you feel like a thief. Really, it's just an ubuntu clone with a pretty osx-like gui. This isn't really anything amazing or new, and it makes it seem like they're trying to tap into the elitist osx market. If that is indeed what they want, they should really check out [2] So it's not really the software that's bad, really it's all what you can get on any other distro with a little work, it's their attitude about it. [1] http://blog.elementary.io/post/110645528530/payments http://blog.elementary.io/post/110645528530/payments [2] http://www.apple.com/jobs/us/ http://www.apple.com/jobs/us/

ics 11y ago
> tap into the elitist osx market I think it would be more accurate to say that they are trying to expand the Linux market by wooing those whose main barrier to using Linux is the UI/UX. Whether or not you find the endeavor to be "noble", the attempt is worth something to the Linux landscape even if your takeaway is "don't run it quite like them".
- tywkeene 11y ago
  Well whatever it they're doing guilt tripping people into giving them money for something that's free everywhere else isn't helping.
  - pekk 11y ago
    OS X is hardly free
  - sbuk 11y ago
    Woa. Wait a minute. They're merely asking for a donation, which can be set to zero. What's the issue with that? This entitled attitude is what irks me about the OSS movement at large. To a larger extent it puts me and people like me off of open source. More projects should take this approach. I thought that it's free as in Liberty, not as in ride. That's what we're constantly told.
    - tywkeene 11y ago
      > We want users to understand that they’re pretty much cheating the system when they choose not to pay for software. http://blog.elementary.io/post/110645528530/payments http://blog.elementary.io/post/110645528530/payments No, their clone can bitrot, they deserve it.
      - sbuk 11y ago
        Wow.
mintplant 11y ago
> This isn't really anything amazing or new One counterexample: Contractor, an Android Intents-like system for sharing data between apps. https://web.archive.org/web/20130314024115/http://elementaryos.org/docs/contractor https://web.archive.org/web/20130314024115/http://elementary... (archive.org link because this info doesn't seem to be on their new site, for whatever reason...) There are other technologies like Switchboard and Granite that are unique to Elementary OS, and many of the user-facing apps were written from scratch.
lazaroclapp 11y ago
You mean like actual Ubuntu? http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/contribute/?version=14.10&architecture=amd64 http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/contribute/?version=1... If you don't see much difference between the UX of the two DE's, I don't think the difference between the "request for donations" UX is that big either. Perhaps there should be some smallish text saying "$0 is a valid custom amount", but that's it. Now, there are of course issues to be discussed about this kinds of donations requests, such as, for example, how much of the funds received make it upstream to the developers whose software distros are repackaging. But I have nothing against the idea that you might be asked whether you'd like to pay for the software or get it for free, with the understanding that both are equally valid options, even if the website is designed to suggest that they'd much prefer if you paid them for their service (added software and distro maintenance). I see nothing there that implies that I am a thief, or even a free loader, if I decide to pay null dollars for their distro. You can view it as either a free project that emphatically asks for donations (which sounds OK), or a paid free-as-in-freedom software project that allows you to get it for free if you don't want to pay (that is also valid, it's like Fedora and Red Hat, except in this case it's the exact same distro, as opposed to "practically the same"). Not saying their site is useful, btw, I had to dig through their blog to even know what ElementaryOS was. But I don't think asking for (optional) payment is the issue there.
- detaro 11y ago
  A lot of upset came from the original version of that blog post, especially the now absent sentence > We want users to understand that they’re pretty much cheating the system when they choose not to pay for software.
  - lazaroclapp 11y ago
    Ok, that's a bit different, specially if they mean that in the general, unless they are contributing directly to every single project they package with their distro and paying every contributor. They are still within their rights to decide that their add-ons are proprietary non-zero cost software, at least those add-ons that don't link GPL code/modify LGPL code. But if their main value added is indeed modifying GPL code, and they would consider people who share those modifications for free or get them for free from a third party to be "cheating the system", I can see the issue.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
ricardobeat 11y ago
Please take a look into the website and the history of Elementary. It's a huge undertaking, not merely 'a skin'. It has it's own HIG for design, a beautiful and consistent design language, and a nice set of custom-made default apps. Pantheon, the UI layer, is written from scratch, not based on Gnome, and has it's own API for writing apps in Vala.

ics 11y ago

> tap into the elitist osx market I think it would be more accurate to say that they are trying to expand the Linux market by wooing those whose main barrier to using Linux is the UI/UX. Whether or not you find the endeavor to be "noble", the attempt is worth something to the Linux landscape even if your takeaway is "don't run it quite like them".

tywkeene 11y ago
Well whatever it they're doing guilt tripping people into giving them money for something that's free everywhere else isn't helping.
- pekk 11y ago
  OS X is hardly free
- sbuk 11y ago
  Woa. Wait a minute. They're merely asking for a donation, which can be set to zero. What's the issue with that? This entitled attitude is what irks me about the OSS movement at large. To a larger extent it puts me and people like me off of open source. More projects should take this approach. I thought that it's free as in Liberty, not as in ride. That's what we're constantly told.
  - tywkeene 11y ago
    > We want users to understand that they’re pretty much cheating the system when they choose not to pay for software. http://blog.elementary.io/post/110645528530/payments http://blog.elementary.io/post/110645528530/payments No, their clone can bitrot, they deserve it.
    - sbuk 11y ago
      Wow.

mintplant 11y ago

> This isn't really anything amazing or new One counterexample: Contractor, an Android Intents-like system for sharing data between apps. https://web.archive.org/web/20130314024115/http://elementaryos.org/docs/contractor https://web.archive.org/web/20130314024115/http://elementary... (archive.org link because this info doesn't seem to be on their new site, for whatever reason...) There are other technologies like Switchboard and Granite that are unique to Elementary OS, and many of the user-facing apps were written from scratch.

lazaroclapp 11y ago

You mean like actual Ubuntu? http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/contribute/?version=14.10&architecture=amd64 http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/contribute/?version=1... If you don't see much difference between the UX of the two DE's, I don't think the difference between the "request for donations" UX is that big either. Perhaps there should be some smallish text saying "$0 is a valid custom amount", but that's it. Now, there are of course issues to be discussed about this kinds of donations requests, such as, for example, how much of the funds received make it upstream to the developers whose software distros are repackaging. But I have nothing against the idea that you might be asked whether you'd like to pay for the software or get it for free, with the understanding that both are equally valid options, even if the website is designed to suggest that they'd much prefer if you paid them for their service (added software and distro maintenance). I see nothing there that implies that I am a thief, or even a free loader, if I decide to pay null dollars for their distro. You can view it as either a free project that emphatically asks for donations (which sounds OK), or a paid free-as-in-freedom software project that allows you to get it for free if you don't want to pay (that is also valid, it's like Fedora and Red Hat, except in this case it's the exact same distro, as opposed to "practically the same"). Not saying their site is useful, btw, I had to dig through their blog to even know what ElementaryOS was. But I don't think asking for (optional) payment is the issue there.

detaro 11y ago
A lot of upset came from the original version of that blog post, especially the now absent sentence > We want users to understand that they’re pretty much cheating the system when they choose not to pay for software.
- lazaroclapp 11y ago
  Ok, that's a bit different, specially if they mean that in the general, unless they are contributing directly to every single project they package with their distro and paying every contributor. They are still within their rights to decide that their add-ons are proprietary non-zero cost software, at least those add-ons that don't link GPL code/modify LGPL code. But if their main value added is indeed modifying GPL code, and they would consider people who share those modifications for free or get them for free from a third party to be "cheating the system", I can see the issue.

deleted 11y ago

[deleted]

ricardobeat 11y ago

Please take a look into the website and the history of Elementary. It's a huge undertaking, not merely 'a skin'. It has it's own HIG for design, a beautiful and consistent design language, and a nice set of custom-made default apps. Pantheon, the UI layer, is written from scratch, not based on Gnome, and has it's own API for writing apps in Vala.