4 ms·
You initiated the claim about systemd and POSIX, as if it were relevant. Show your work. (I've just looked at your history of comments. Discussion over.)
by jdub 12y ago
You initiated the claim about systemd and POSIX, as if it were relevant. Show your work.
(I've just looked at your history of comments. Discussion over.)
- anonbanker 12y agohow nice of you to decide when the conversation ends. Before you go, can you at least explain why you think systemd would pass POSIX compliance testing? are you familiar with both the standard and systemd's codebase? or was this conjecture?
- dang 12y agoPlease, both of you, don't bicker like this on Hacker News.
- anonbanker 12y agoNoted. forgive me. I was attempting to see how far the systemd apologists would go to defend their project (a call to arms was made on #systemd on IRC to post on this thread). They usually flood the thread with people (one new account was made for this HN thread specifically), and I was curious to see how many people it would take to defend a propaganda blitz. I counted three pro-systemd people in the thread, and you'll note from my past posting history, this is the longest back-and-forth I've participated in. there is a definite pattern of systemd sockpuppetry on HN, and I figured you should at least see how far they'll go. Thank you for keeping HN civil.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]