2 ms·

I'm saying it's irrelevant. (Plus, you have yet to point out anything about POSIX that is incompatible with systemd, or vice versa. Go away now, troll.)

by jdub 12y ago

anonbanker 12y ago
so, I'm confused; are you calling me a troll because you can't state that systemd would pass POSIX compliance, or because you agree that Lennart doesn't like POSIX at all? Do you even use OpenBSD?
- jdub 12y ago
  Like I said: If anyone still cared about POSIX, I'm sure you could waste money to get a systemd platform fully certified. Again, show your work.
  - anonbanker 12y ago
    show your work. You state it again as if it meant something. But back to my question: you're stating that, if tested, systemd would pass POSIX compliance. that's very interesting, and I'd like to see how you came to that conclusion. care to elaborate?
    - jdub 12y ago
      You initiated the claim about systemd and POSIX, as if it were relevant. Show your work. (I've just looked at your history of comments. Discussion over.)
      - anonbanker 12y ago
        how nice of you to decide when the conversation ends. Before you go, can you at least explain why you think systemd would pass POSIX compliance testing? are you familiar with both the standard and systemd's codebase? or was this conjecture?
        dang 12y ago
        Please, both of you, don't bicker like this on Hacker News.
        anonbanker 12y ago
        Noted. forgive me. I was attempting to see how far the systemd apologists would go to defend their project (a call to arms was made on #systemd on IRC to post on this thread). They usually flood the thread with people (one new account was made for this HN thread specifically), and I was curious to see how many people it would take to defend a propaganda blitz. I counted three pro-systemd people in the thread, and you'll note from my past posting history, this is the longest back-and-forth I've participated in. there is a definite pattern of systemd sockpuppetry on HN, and I figured you should at least see how far they'll go. Thank you for keeping HN civil.
        deleted 12y ago
        [deleted]

I'm saying it's irrelevant. (Plus, you have yet to point out anything about POSIX that is incompatible with systemd, or vice versa. Go away now, troll.)

by jdub 12y ago

I'm saying it's irrelevant. (Plus, you have yet to point out anything about POSIX that is incompatible with systemd, or vice versa. Go away now, troll.)

anonbanker 12y ago

so, I'm confused; are you calling me a troll because you can't state that systemd would pass POSIX compliance, or because you agree that Lennart doesn't like POSIX at all? Do you even use OpenBSD?

jdub 12y ago
Like I said: If anyone still cared about POSIX, I'm sure you could waste money to get a systemd platform fully certified. Again, show your work.
- anonbanker 12y ago
  show your work. You state it again as if it meant something. But back to my question: you're stating that, if tested, systemd would pass POSIX compliance. that's very interesting, and I'd like to see how you came to that conclusion. care to elaborate?
  - jdub 12y ago
    You initiated the claim about systemd and POSIX, as if it were relevant. Show your work. (I've just looked at your history of comments. Discussion over.)
    - anonbanker 12y ago
      how nice of you to decide when the conversation ends. Before you go, can you at least explain why you think systemd would pass POSIX compliance testing? are you familiar with both the standard and systemd's codebase? or was this conjecture?
      - dang 12y ago
        Please, both of you, don't bicker like this on Hacker News.
        anonbanker 12y ago
        Noted. forgive me. I was attempting to see how far the systemd apologists would go to defend their project (a call to arms was made on #systemd on IRC to post on this thread). They usually flood the thread with people (one new account was made for this HN thread specifically), and I was curious to see how many people it would take to defend a propaganda blitz. I counted three pro-systemd people in the thread, and you'll note from my past posting history, this is the longest back-and-forth I've participated in. there is a definite pattern of systemd sockpuppetry on HN, and I figured you should at least see how far they'll go. Thank you for keeping HN civil.
        deleted 12y ago
        [deleted]