4 ms·
This is a really cool site. We should load up the probes with toxic nuclear waste to dispose in space on the way up, then come back down with valuable materials
by jliptzin 12y ago
This is a really cool site. We should load up the probes with toxic nuclear waste to dispose in space on the way up, then come back down with valuable materials mined from the asteroids.
- lockes5hadow 12y agoNo, each pound of payload makes the launch way more expensive. Just keep the nuclear waste down here.
- rational-future 12y agoYes, because space rockets never blow up on take off or shortly after.
- cpa 12y agoIf you manage to safely (that's the keyword here) send toxic waste in space, just shoot it straight into the sun, that's way more eco-friendly!
- Lorento 12y agoIf you miss, it'll end up in an orbit that intersects Earth's orbit. That might be the opposite of eco-friendly!
- siscia 12y agoWell we are able to send robot on Mars, miss the sun seems quite an huge error for me... You make me laugh tough :)
- Rumford 12y agoI don't know if that is a serious suggestion, but the delta V required to hit the sun is enormous. That is about the most expensive technique imaginable for disposing of anything.
- hyperion2010 12y agoWe won't even put the stuff in a cave in a desert that will be stable for the next 10,000 years with probability of .999999. Rockets? Those things blow up quite regularly and spread their debris over vast tracts of land. Also, radioactive waste is about as dense and heavy a payload as you could possibly imagine. Just mine the asteroids, they require lower delta V than Mars (yay no gravity well) and there are, as demonstrated by this site, better economic incentives to do so.
- quotemstr 12y agoSomeday, we'll want to mine that "waste".