3 ms·
Is 4 billion a lot? that's like 1/2 a day's flow of the Mississippi. edit: Ah, it looks like water there is around $1000, per acre foot. 12,000 acre feet, so
by jfoutz 12y ago
Is 4 billion a lot? that's like 1/2 a day's flow of the Mississippi.
edit:
Ah, it looks like water there is around $1000, per acre foot. 12,000 acre feet, so 1.2 million. 200k per fish sounds pretty steep, but it looks like there are other benefits.
edit 2:
looks like Nestle pays about 30 bucks per acre foot. So that's only 60k per fish.
- MichaelGG 12y agoI hate when they throw numbers around without scale. I'd have the same reaction if the question was 400M gallons, or 40M. It sounds like a lot, I guess. But if it's only $60K per fish and this is some particularly great way of preserving them or rekindling an ecosystem, maybe that's a great deal. Or maybe it's off by an order is magnitude, in either direction.