4 ms·
Can anyone comment on why they are tag-averse? In my mental model, applying the git tag is just a standard (and arguably the first) step in making a release. T
by mdaniel 12y ago
Can anyone comment on why they are tag-averse? In my mental model, applying the git tag is just a standard (and arguably the first) step in making a release.
This link is 404 as of this comment:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tag/?id=emacs-24.5 http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tag/?id=emacs-24....
- habitue 12y agoThey just switched to git from bazarre recently, it's possible they are using it idiosyncratically at the moment
- onedognight 12y agoIt's more than just possible, it's likely. They have recently had long flame wars because old timers don't want to, and think they shouldn't have to, learn about the git's "index" and think git should be changed to push on commit like cvs. Give them time.
- pmontra 12y agoThis reminds me that with git sometimes you don't have anything to push to. Example 1: a repository is local by definition and if you work alone you can back it up to your USB disk and never push it to any remote. Example 2: there are many ways to send diffs to other developers. Push is one of them but you can also use git-format-patch and git-send-email together to mail them to your team. http://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch http://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch http://git-scm.com/docs/git-send-email http://git-scm.com/docs/git-send-email
- phillord2 12y agoIt was a mistake. The tag wasn't pushed is all.