What? That's not at all true. Just because a person doesn't, themselves, own a computer, doesn't mean their lives aren't touched by their existence. As the f

What? That's not at all true. Just because a person doesn't, themselves, own a computer, doesn't mean their lives aren't touched by their existence. As the first example that springs to mind: computers have enabled access to telecommunications infrastructure (think cell phones), which have utterly transformed the lives of many of the world's poorest. But a pipedream consensus database running on the internet? Colour me skeptical that it's going to utterly transform the world the way the computer has.