4 ms·

Yes, I do not trust any BitTorrent software. I wasn't being careful at installation and was shocked to find uTorrent changed my default search engine and added

by ruggeri 12y ago

Yes, I do not trust any BitTorrent software. I wasn't being careful at installation and was shocked to find uTorrent changed my default search engine and added a bunch of bookmarks. I wasn't even aware it was developed by BitTorrent. On the positive side: Transmission works great!

ComputerGuru 12y ago
It wasn't. They bought it out several years ago. You can still find the last original version on the net somewhere - it's surprisingly good and has aged really well. In fact, I get better performance out of it than out of Deluge or Transmission. Edit: here you are. you can still run it without instaing even: http://www.filehorse.com/download-utorrent/7858/ http://www.filehorse.com/download-utorrent/7858/
- slacka 12y ago
  Of course Deluge, written in python can not compare to uTorrent's tightly optimized C++ code. Transmission is better, but its back-end (libTransmission) is not as well optimized as libtorrent-rasterbar. Any C++ client based on rasterbar such as qBittorrent should offer similar performance to uTorrent. If you don't require streaming, older uTorrect clients are still your best option. If you do, it IS possible to install the recent version of uTorrect without any external adware and to disable all of the banner ads.[1] [1] http://forum.utorrent.com/topic/81421-321-how-to-turn-off-ads-except-for-the-silly-upgrade-banner/page-3 http://forum.utorrent.com/topic/81421-321-how-to-turn-off-ad...
  - adrusi 12y ago
    The performance of bittorrent has almost nothing to do with the performance of the language the client is written in. Its not an io-bound task. Performance in bittorrent comes from selecting the right chunks at the right time from the right peers. I think utorrent uses its own algorithm whereas both deluge and transmission use libtorrent's built in algorithm (which is configurable, but only to an extent). Transmission and deluge often max out my bandwidth though, so its not like they're poor performers.
    - slacka 12y ago
      Deluge and Transmission do NOT use the same libtorrent back-end. Also, you may be right about Deluge not being CPU bound on your i7 based desktop, but I can tell you from first hand experience that both Deluge and the Java based Vuze were maxing out my Atom based home server. Switching to the C++ based qBittorrent, resolved the issue.
      - baldfat 12y ago
        aria2c on command line. Fastest download application ever for everything including bittorrent and including metalinks.
- jszymborski 12y ago
  I'd just be a little bit afraid of security issues no? There have been a couple of uTorrent vulnerabilities in the past. http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=6117&product_id=0&version_id=0&page=1&hasexp=0&opdos=0&opec=0&opov=0&opcsrf=0&opgpriv=0&opsqli=0&opxss=0&opdirt=0&opmemc=0&ophttprs=0&opbyp=0&opfileinc=0&opginf=0&cvssscoremin=0&cvssscoremax=0&year=0&month=0&cweid=0&order=1&trc=9&sha=7820e6ca025f1883b7fbfe5f1a0e31a4a92cfb91 http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=6...

by ruggeri 12y ago

ComputerGuru 12y ago

It wasn't. They bought it out several years ago. You can still find the last original version on the net somewhere - it's surprisingly good and has aged really well. In fact, I get better performance out of it than out of Deluge or Transmission. Edit: here you are. you can still run it without instaing even: http://www.filehorse.com/download-utorrent/7858/ http://www.filehorse.com/download-utorrent/7858/

slacka 12y ago
Of course Deluge, written in python can not compare to uTorrent's tightly optimized C++ code. Transmission is better, but its back-end (libTransmission) is not as well optimized as libtorrent-rasterbar. Any C++ client based on rasterbar such as qBittorrent should offer similar performance to uTorrent. If you don't require streaming, older uTorrect clients are still your best option. If you do, it IS possible to install the recent version of uTorrect without any external adware and to disable all of the banner ads.[1] [1] http://forum.utorrent.com/topic/81421-321-how-to-turn-off-ads-except-for-the-silly-upgrade-banner/page-3 http://forum.utorrent.com/topic/81421-321-how-to-turn-off-ad...
- adrusi 12y ago
  The performance of bittorrent has almost nothing to do with the performance of the language the client is written in. Its not an io-bound task. Performance in bittorrent comes from selecting the right chunks at the right time from the right peers. I think utorrent uses its own algorithm whereas both deluge and transmission use libtorrent's built in algorithm (which is configurable, but only to an extent). Transmission and deluge often max out my bandwidth though, so its not like they're poor performers.
  - slacka 12y ago
    Deluge and Transmission do NOT use the same libtorrent back-end. Also, you may be right about Deluge not being CPU bound on your i7 based desktop, but I can tell you from first hand experience that both Deluge and the Java based Vuze were maxing out my Atom based home server. Switching to the C++ based qBittorrent, resolved the issue.
    - baldfat 12y ago
      aria2c on command line. Fastest download application ever for everything including bittorrent and including metalinks.
jszymborski 12y ago
I'd just be a little bit afraid of security issues no? There have been a couple of uTorrent vulnerabilities in the past. http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=6117&product_id=0&version_id=0&page=1&hasexp=0&opdos=0&opec=0&opov=0&opcsrf=0&opgpriv=0&opsqli=0&opxss=0&opdirt=0&opmemc=0&ophttprs=0&opbyp=0&opfileinc=0&opginf=0&cvssscoremin=0&cvssscoremax=0&year=0&month=0&cweid=0&order=1&trc=9&sha=7820e6ca025f1883b7fbfe5f1a0e31a4a92cfb91 http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=6...