3 ms·
The only confused person here is plainly yourself. Either that or you are somehow personally offended and desperately looking to excuse that wrongheaded comment
by _0ffh 12y ago
The only confused person here is plainly yourself. Either that or you are somehow personally offended and desperately looking to excuse that wrongheaded comment, changing tack every time your latest attempt is shot down. Or you're just a troll. I am running out of care to educate you.
Go on and complain about tree types for not handling cycles. Because hey, sometimes you need cycles, don't you? I will be sure not to comment.
Image related.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/131/351/eb6.jpg http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/131/351/eb6...
- coldtea 12y agoBesides being rude and offensive (plus tacky, with your meme picture), you still don't seem to comprehend that: 1) the Python standard library is not SymPy or some math modelling library, and its collections are not supposed to map 1 to 1 with the corresponding mathematical entities -- just have those properties that are useful. In fact, the standard python set type is mutable to begin with. 2) even if they were, there are versions of sets in maths were ordering is indeed desired. So this makes your snarky comments needlessly smug and misguiged in 2 different ways. But given the rudeness, I don't think this warrants any more discussion. Have a nice life.