>> nailer: Fitting more on screen, and having a higher signal/noise ratio is /objectively better/ than otherwise. > NateDad: You state your view as fact, but y

>> nailer: Fitting more on screen, and having a higher signal/noise ratio is /objectively better/ than otherwise. > NateDad: You state your view as fact, but you haven't considered some very obvious things that would normally be prerequisites to having that level of confidence: Careful. You might be the one here who haven't considered some obvious things. I think parent as well as dagw's comment (Does that mean that J/K/APL are the objectively best programming languages?) explaint perfectly well why what you wrote where flawed.